Amid mounting public scrutiny and heated protests over automated surveillance, Flock Safety Chief Executive Officer Garrett Langley addressed critics head-on during a high-profile appearance at the Disrupt 2026 conference in San Francisco. Responding to widespread concerns regarding data abuse by law enforcement, Langley maintained that while the company has internal ethical debates, it has not yet terminated contracts with any police department.
The controversy surrounding the Atlanta, Georgia-based automatic license plate reader (ALPR) manufacturer has intensified in recent months. Flock’s network of over 100,000 cameras spans across the United States, enabling local police departments and federal agencies to track vehicle locations and movements in real time through a massive centralized database.
However, this nationwide reach—which allows agencies to track vehicles across state lines and outside their local jurisdictions—has triggered a fierce civil liberties backlash. Investigative reports have identified numerous instances where police officers abused the database to stalk individuals without authorization, resulting in arrests, resignations, or firings.
When pressed by TechCrunch editor-in-chief Connie Loizos on whether Flock would sever ties with compromised agencies, Langley drew a distinction between individual misconduct and institutional termination.
“If a customer knowingly broke the law, we would fire them immediately. That’s very easy,” Langley stated on stage. However, addressing nuanced scenarios involving officer misconduct, he added, “Most of the debate is nuanced into ‘what if two officers out of fifty were caught?’ Today, we haven’t fired any customers, but it’s not off the table in the case of some pretty drastic law-abiding issue.”
Langley argued that revoking a community's access to crime-fighting tools due to internal departmental misconduct would ultimately penalize the public safety of neighborhoods that rely on the technology. He highlighted success stories, such as the rapid recovery of stolen vehicles involving endangered infants, as core justifications for the network's operational value.
A Flashpoint for Public Protests and Privacy Concerns
Outside the Moscone Center venue in San Francisco, the conference’s technological showcase was met with an entirely different reception. Demonstrators from grassroots privacy and progressive coalitions—such as local activist group The Wolves—gathered in protest, donning red dystopian costumes reminiscent of The Handmaid’s Tale and wearing cardboard mock-ups of Flock cameras on their heads.
Protesters voiced sharp opposition to AI-powered mass surveillance, pointing to past cybersecurity vulnerabilities, camera misreads that led to wrongful police stops (including one involving a journalist driving a review vehicle), and unauthorized data sharing. While Flock has no direct contract with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), privacy advocates have flagged instances where federal immigration authorities accessed Flock data via local law enforcement partnerships.
Ashley Ortiz, an organizer with The Wolves, emphasized that opposition to automated surveillance transcends traditional political lines.
“I think Flock is going to be the start of a lot more community building, because we can come together around something as bipartisan as not enjoying mass surveillance,” Ortiz told reporters outside the venue. “We have Republicans who join us, conservatives who agree, we have sovereign citizens cutting down Flock cameras, so it’s not just the left who doesn’t want AI-powered mass surveillance.”
The Competitive and Commercial Landscape
As public pressure mounts, some municipalities have begun allowing their Flock contracts to expire, choosing instead to dismantle the hardware or replace systems with competitors like Axon—the prominent manufacturer of law enforcement tasers and body cameras.
Despite market speculation regarding a potential acquisition by larger defense or public safety tech giants, Langley dismissed rumors of a corporate buyout. “No, we’ve no desire to sell the company,” he affirmed.
As the debate over municipal surveillance and civil liberties continues to evolve across the United States, NewsSkook will continue tracking the regulatory, legal, and technological developments surrounding automated public safety networks.
Have a tip or perspective on enterprise surveillance and public policy? Reach out directly to our Tech Desk at [email protected].